I have read parts of the Conti case appeal by McCabe, and am also left to wonder:
Does the Org act as if the "know not," just so they can delay & appeal and hit with their wilier & bigger gunslater?
Sounds like a good lawyer tactic.
P.S. After looking at the case in San Diego
**of which McCabe was a part of
** where a boy was abused (the abuser had been a pioneer, MS, & elder.. see details in link below)
**the mom, Manuela Dorman, was basically threatened w/blackmail if she were to pursue it...
** “I also called Roberto Rivera, Johnny River’as father. I told him about my son’s abuse and that John had told me that Brother Rivera’s son, Johnny, had also been abused. Roberto told me he would call me back after he had spoken to his son, Johnny, and the church Elders. Roberto called me back and told me that the Elders said I should not take any further action or call anyone else in the congregation about what had happened, or an affair that I had when I was attending the Linda Vista Congregation would be made public in the congregation. I told Roberto that I did not care, and that I would continue to push the issue.
** and the case was settled "out of court" with a gag order (you can still read the depositions, I believe)
Pge 104 of this link, but page 6 of Manuela Dorman's deposition, line 12 - 19 http://www.watchtowerdocuments.com/cases/Zalkin-Plaintiff_John_Dorman's_Ntc_of_Lodgment_in_Support_of_Opp_to_Mtns_for_Summary_Judgment_12-16-11.pdf
Can an attorney use quotes from these depositions in another case?
Can he even refer to these depositions if there is a gag order????
Also, let's say there was someone that was depositioned, but not awarded any money.
Does the gag order apply to them? Can the Society or Court prevent them from saying anything or testifying in another case?